Part 3: Overview Discussion with Stakeholders NURS FPX 6416 Assessment

by Posted on

Part 3: Overview Discussion with Stakeholders

The stakeholders involved in the implementation of informational change in the healthcare setting include information technology experts, administrators, and managers along with the nurse and clinical informatics (Javaid et al., 2024). The objective of the change implementation is to provide effective care to patients who are unable to visit hospitals daily due to their isolated geographic locations and age factors. The RPM and patient portal allow the healthcare providers to effectively monitor the health situation of the patients and provide them with standard health safety. The framework was implemented to effectively integrate change management theory in the evaluation report regarding the proficiency of the informational change.

Monitoring of Barriers

The evaluation plan helps in identifying the barriers in the way of the improved response of the patients regarding healthcare services (Wong et al., 2020). The major barriers identified include the ineffective care provided to patients due to their stay at home and the financial concerns of the patients. The death rate of patients is increasing due to their inability to get on time treatment and delays cause deteriorating health situations making it impossible for healthcare providers to treat effectively. Moreover, the staff is becoming burdened due to the increasing rate of patients in worse health situations.

Solutions to the Barriers

To overcome the problem of ineffective care for the patients the RPM and patient portals have been installed in the clinical facility to ensure that all the patients are getting full care without any delays as these systems are effective in actively monitoring the health situation of the patient and providing timely response to prevent health damages (Serrano et al., 2023). This integration will increase the rate of patient satisfaction and decrease the death rate by providing early healthcare services to the patients. The after-discharge care coordination can also be improved using this system.

NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 3 Conclusion

The Vila health system identified the need for RPM and patient portals to improve the response of the patients regarding the care quality provided to them (Popescu et al., 2022). The integration of the information system can be effective by evaluating its impact on the patients and the healthcare providers. The different evaluation frameworks and the components are implemented along with the change management theory to ensure valid data is obtained from the assessment of the information implementation in the medical setting. The evaluation table is prepared to evaluate the involvement of the stakeholders in the project and the quality outcomes of the project.

3 References

Bhati, D., Deogade, M. S., & Kanyal, D. (2023). Improving patient outcomes through effective hospital administration: A comprehensive review. Cureus, 15(10), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47731

Hanbury, A., Mafirakureva, N., Chicken, N., & Bailey, L. D. (2023). Evaluating change in a pressured healthcare system: A cross-sectional study of implementation outcomes using routine data indicators and proxies. Implementation Science Communications, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00471-x

Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Dao, H. (2021). Where do models for change management, improvement and implementation meet? a systematic review of the applications of change management models in healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 13(2), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., & Singh, R. P. (2024). Health informatics to enhance the healthcare industry’s culture: An extensive analysis of its features, contributions, applications and limitations. Informatics and Health, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoh.2024.05.001

Laurisz, N., Ćwiklicki, M., Żabiński, M., Canestrino, R., & Magliocca, P. (2023). The stakeholders’ involvement in healthcare 4.0 services provision: The perspective of co-creation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2416. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032416

Nilsen, P., Seing, I., Ericsson, C., Birken, S. A., & Schildmeijer, K. (2020). Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: an interview study with physicians, registered nurses and assistant nurses. BMC Health Services Research, 20(147), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8

Popescu, C., Chaarani, H. E., Abiad, Z. E., & Gigauri, I. (2022). Implementation of health information systems to improve patient identification. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215236

Serrano, L. P., Maita, K. C., Ávila, F. R., Torres‐Guzman, R. A., Garcia, J. P., Eldaly, A. S., Haider, C. R., Felton, C. L., Paulson, M. R., Maniaci, M. J., & Forte, A. J. (2023). Benefits and challenges of remote patient monitoring as perceived by health care practitioners: A systematic review. The Permanente Journal, 27(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7812/tpp/23.022

Wong, E., Mavondo, F., & Fisher, J. (2020). Patient feedback to improve quality of patient-centred care in public hospitals: A systematic review of the evidence. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05383-3

Published by Ivy