Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) function independently and across borders, taking on issues affecting global health; such is the case with NGOs involved in preventing HIV and AIDS (Gaspar et al., 2022). The discussion centers around HIV and AIDS prevention via the South African National AIDS Council, which involves mobilizing resources, advocacy, and support to high-risk groups. A SANAC program officer reveals strategies implemented against the fight of the HIV/AIDS crisis and in enhancing public health services.NURS FPX 8014 Assessment 1: Nongovernmental Agencies Involved in Global Issues The analysis contrasts the government-backed initiatives with NGO-led programs, such as SANAC, which underpin the argument that the former focuses on reducing health disparities. These differences will elucidate how collaboration can work towards improving the health results for at-risk groups.

Difference Between Public Health NGO’s and Governmental Public Health Organizations

The South African National AIDS Council (SANAC) functions as a non-profit organization aimed at improving community health, not under the influence of the government. It primarily advocates and works with local communities to solve certain health problems. SANAC usually mobilizes resources and volunteers for adaptable programs targeting vulnerable populations. Whereas it may be funded by the government, its programs fall in line with nonprofit objectives: to promote public health. For example, SANAC utilizes community networks to implement HIV/AIDS strategies for prevention and treatment that are specifically customized to address the needs of the particular groups it works with (South African National AIDS Council, 2023).

The public health organizations under the government receive funding and administration from the state to implement national health policies and programs (Jones & Hameiri, 2022). They are more concerned with establishing health infrastructure, tracking diseases, and health education. For instance, the Department of Health fights the HIV/AIDS epidemic through strategies that would prevent it and treat those affected. Mostly, they will be working together with NGOs such as SANAC for an integrated response. Government agencies are also partnering with NGOs in the gap-filling process, which eventually increases the public health outcome.

History of the South African National AIDS Council (SANAC)

The South African National AIDS Council was founded in 2000 in reaction to the increasingly worsened HIV/AIDS epidemic in South Africa, the country with the highest HIV prevalence worldwide. SANAC is established to spearhead the coordinated national response against the epidemic through the engagement of various stakeholders, such as government, nongovernmental organizations, and civil society structures (South African National AIDS Council, 2023). It encourages an integrated approach to HIV intervention, treatment, and care. In addressing the epidemic, the council tackles the social and economic drivers that have sustained it. With time, SANAC has adopted a collaborative, multisectoral approach to tackle HIV/AIDS issues comprehensively.

Financial Health of  SANAC and Current Data

SANAC sources funds from its different contributions including even from the South African government and various international organizations. Most recently, it has even gotten about $750 million from the Global Fund to combat AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis. This further supplements efforts to curb HIV/AIDS (The Global Fund, 2024). The money allocated is: 70% in treatment and prevention, 20% for community mobilization, and 10% to cater for administrative expenses to facilitate proper running of the organization. The resources increase SANAC’s strength in combating HIV/AIDS and programs related to it.

In its last fiscal year, SANAC spent roughly $600 million on HIV/AIDS programs. Since the past five years, such funding has made antiretroviral therapy (ART) available to over 5 million people. UNAIDS, 2023 indicates that new infections have decreased by 30% during this period. For the next three years, SANAC will increase its budget by 15% as it seeks to spread its coverage even further and have better health results. Investments in HIV/AIDS initiatives in South Africa have delivered significant health improvements, demonstrating the effectiveness of SANAC’s efforts in combating the epidemic.

Countries with SANAC Presence

While SANAC conducts most of its work in South Africa, it collaborates with regional countries within the SADC, such as Lesotho, Botswana, Namibia, Zimbabwe, and Swaziland, to enhance the success of efforts to combat HIV/AIDS. The collaboration develops regional strategies and shares best practices for better public health responses (SADC, 2023). SANAC involves governments, NGOs, community groups, and individuals directly affected by HIV/AIDS. Membership is open to anyone committed to the fight against the epidemic, the promotion of teamwork, and diverse perspectives. Such openness helps increase SANAC’s efforts through valuable input and expertise coming from various communities.

Advantages of Public Health NGO’s over Government-Sponsored Programs

Public health NGOs such as SANAC are key in the HIV/AIDS fight as they offer services similar to government programs (Kajiita & Kang’ethe, 2023). This is because NGOs can mobilize community resources hence reach and service the local people effectively. As long as an NGO maintains strong ties with its target groups, it can carry out targeted outreach and education programs. Moreover, the flexibility in their operations gives them the leverage to respond effectively to new health concerns, thus addressing them promptly.

SANAC applies various approaches to raising funding, for example, targeted fundraising, engaging donors, and developing grant proposals. This differs from government programs, which depend solely on taxpayers’ money and the budgeting process. With SANAC having private donations and international grants, its approaches are flexible as well as in the implementation of strategies that might not be feasible under the confines of a government program. Such resources give the organization a chance to cope more effectively with health challenges.

How Funds Are Distributed

In public health NGOs like SANAC, the source of funding allocated is the preference of the organizations, where in this case they target populations considered to be under the most extreme need. In this respect, the funds can be used within different programs of awareness, treatment, and the training of health professionals, which does not involve complicated processes as is expected in government programs. Proper planning and monitoring ensure that the funds are used transparently, enhancing donor trust and maximizing the effect on HIV/AIDS reduction in South Africa.

How Application for Assistance is Made

Most public health NGOs present a proposal outlining the health issue, the target population, and the proposed intervention in their search for funding. To seek support from SANAC, organizations submit a detailed plan showing their objectives and specific health concerns such as HIV/AIDS. These applications are evaluated by the review committee, who assess the proposals based on the feasibility and community engagement. Those who are deemed successful are given funding to carry out projects to improve public health outcomes in South Africa.

Challenges of Public Health NGO’s

Public health NGOs, including the South African National AIDS Council (SANAC), work through community engagement and partnerships to fight health issues such as HIV/AIDS (Kajiita & Kang’ethe, 2023). These usually mobilize community resources and volunteers according to the need to implement their services. The majority of NGOs are prone to financial strain because their budgets rely on donations and grants that are often irregular, thus affecting the continuity of programs. This can hinder their ability to plan for the future and, as a result, decrease their effectiveness in improving public health.

Government-backed programs are well-funded and have solid structures that ensure addressing a significant proportion of health issues. Nevertheless, bureaucratic processes hinder the smooth flow of these programs, making them take more time to deliver. They generally have more resources than NGOs, hence reaching the target population much more effectively. Outreach is also one of the significant challenges that NGOs experience, especially within stigmatized communities where the influence of HIV/AIDS is significant (Hossain et al., 2022). NGOs should, therefore, collaborate with government programs and use the available resources to improve health results, including efforts to combat HIV/AIDS.

Sufficiency of Data

HIV/AIDS is recognized as a global health issue, though the impact is very different in different countries (Staupe & Rubin, 2022). For example, South Africa remains one of the countries with the highest prevalence rates globally. HIV/AIDS has an impact that goes beyond the health of individuals; it affects economic stability and strains public health systems. The WHO addresses issues such as disease outbreaks and health inequalities (World Health Organization, 2023). For a better understanding of these issues, it is important to analyze comprehensive data. Public health organizations like SANAC rely on such data to design strategies and direct interventions that address the most pressing needs within affected communities.

Public health NGOs evaluate the quality of available information by determining what it tells them about their health-related response strategies. They mainly use both numerical and descriptive information collected from research, questionnaires, and health evaluations. The information enables public health NGOs to determine the severity of problems like HIV/AIDS, who should be intervened with, and what will be needed for proper intervention (Silke et al., 2024). SANAC measures the occurrence of HIV/AIDS and related health issues using national health data, local surveys, and input from communities. This evidence-based approach ensures that the organization invests in public health strategies with the most effect.

In requesting help from SANAC, there is a need to have a clear proposal in place that defines the needs that have been identified and possible areas where collaboration can take place. Such a proposal would reflect a great understanding of the local HIV/AIDS situation, based on relevant data that would amplify the urgency in dealing with this issue (Metekoua et al., 2025). Engaging with SANAC would mean explaining how their competencies and capacities can fill care gaps. Common goals and mutual benefit-based partnership enhances the possibility of receiving support and, consequently, improves the interventions and health outcomes for those infected and experiencing HIV/AIDS in South Africa.

Practicum Research and Interviewing Experiences

The practicum hours with SANAC have enabled me to gain greater insight into the public health organization and its ways of working. Observing the way SANAC is handling the HIV/AIDS situation has challenged previous views I held about NGOs being less efficient than government programs, which I perceived as more resourceful and organized. However, my experience revealed that NGOs like SANAC are much more flexible and responsive by offering their respective services in a personalized manner than government programs. This experience demonstrated the value of NGOs in meeting specific health needs of communities.

Engaging stakeholders from communities, health professionals, and civil society organizations like SANAC makes public health interventions effective (Boakye et al., 2024). A good community engagement model secures resource mobilization and advocating for the welfare of vulnerable members. This therefore demonstrates how in most cases, NGOs can be agile and responsive where government programs seem to be weighed down by bureaucratic factors. These findings changed the perspective of analyzing with an approach to emphasize community-based initiatives for this purpose.

My experience has deepened my understanding of the importance of community-based, collaborative approaches to public health. Tailored interventions are essential to addressing local health challenges, and this insight will guide my future decisions to form partnerships with community leaders. SANAC’s influence has significantly shaped public health practice by highlighting the value of NGO collaborations in developing effective interventions (Abeykoon, 2021). The experience has made me understand the need to cooperate in both NGO and government operations to curb health issues like HIV/AIDS. This knowledge will help me stay committed to equitable healthcare throughout my career.

Conclusion

Looking at SANAC, NGOs have been the ones making a big difference in addressing HIV/AIDS. The experience shows that NGOs add flexibility and community-driven approaches, which significantly improve government-run initiatives. It is only by collaborating with NGOs that health interventions will be improved and specific needs of local communities will be addressed. These insights will inform future public health practice, encouraging the development of solutions that are equitable and tailored to the specific challenges faced by target populations.

References

Abeykoon, P. (2021). Partnerships in health development. Journal of Health Management, 23(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063421995007

Boakye, D. S., Kumah, E., & Adjorlolo, S. (2024). The fight for an AIDS-Free world. Annals of Global Health, 90(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4414

Gaspar, B., Moreira, A. C., Cercas, C., Queirós, R., & Campos, S. (2022). The internationalization of nongovernmental organizations. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040140

Hossain, M. I., Ahmad, I., Mehedi, N., Akter, R., & Cane, T. C. (2022). Social stigma and vulnerabilities of HIV/AIDS-positive people. Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15381501.2022.2060399

Jones, L., & Hameiri, S. (2022). Explaining the failure of global health governance during COVID-19. International Affairs, 98(6), 2057–2076. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac231

Kajiita, R. M., & Kang’ethe, S. M. (2023). Grassroots non-governmental organizations and the fight against HIV/AIDS in South Africa. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(11), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i11.1607

Malakoane, B., Heunis, J. C., Chikobvu, P., Kigozi, N. G., & Kruger, W. H. (2020). Public health system challenges in the free state, South Africa. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4862-y

Metekoua, C., Ruffieux, Y., Mwansa, J., Kellett, P., Egger, M., Muchengeti, M., Rohner, E., & Wiggill, T. (2025). Patterns of incident burkitt lymphoma during the HIV epidemic among the Black African and White population in South Africa. British Journal of Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02937-8

SADC. (2023). Southern African Development Community:: Home. Sadc. int. https://www.sadc.int/

Silke, F., Earl, L., Johnathan, H., Mark, M., Jonah, J., Aishe, M., Danielle, M., Peng, Z., Aleksandr, A., Christopher, J., Marcia, R. (2024). Cost-effectiveness of interventions for HIV/AIDS, malaria, syphilis, and tuberculosis in 128 countries. The Lancet. Global Health/the Lancet. Global Health, 12(7), e1159–e1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(24)00181-5