Managing Timelines for IRB Approval and Project Completion Without Fixed Deadlines
Managing Timelines for IRB Approval and Project Completion Without Fixed Deadlines
One of the most unique challenges of completing a DNP practice change project in FlexPath is managing timelines without the safety net of preset due dates. For many, this freedom is empowering; for me, it was both liberating and a test of my self-discipline.
When it came to IRB approval, I knew delays could have a domino effect on my entire project. To avoid this, I built a reverse timeline—starting from my desired project completion date and working backward to set milestone deadlines for literature review, proposal writing, IRB submission, and approval follow-up. Even though FlexPath doesn’t impose deadlines, my self-imposed structure kept the process moving smoothly.
I also learned to anticipate potential slowdowns. For example, the IRB review process often requires revisions. Instead of waiting for feedback passively, I preemptively prepared alternative data collection tools and backup plans for site access. This proactive mindset saved weeks of downtime.
When it came to project completion, I applied the same principle—breaking down the implementation phase into smaller, measurable goals. Weekly check-ins with my preceptor kept me accountable, while progress logs ensured I could track each phase’s completion.
Ultimately, managing timelines without fixed deadlines in FlexPath taught me that successful doctoral-level work requires a blend of autonomy and discipline. This skill—self-regulated project management—will serve me well beyond my DNP journey, especially in leadership roles that demand independent decision-making and accountability.
24. When Scholarly Research Directly Improved My Clinical Practice
Completing a DNP practice change project in FlexPath gave me a front-row seat to the transformative power of scholarly research in clinical practice. One particular moment stands out—when my research findings directly changed the way my team approached patient care.
My project focused on reducing hospital readmissions for patients with chronic heart failure. Through my literature review, I discovered a body of evidence supporting structured discharge education and early follow-up calls as key strategies. Implementing this in my clinical setting required coordination with case managers, nurses, and physicians.
Within the first month of implementation, we saw a noticeable drop in 30-day readmissions. Patients reported feeling more confident in managing their conditions at home, and staff felt empowered by having a clear, evidence-based protocol to follow.
This wasn’t just an academic success—it was a professional turning point. For the first time, I saw my scholarly research create immediate, measurable improvements in patient outcomes. The FlexPath DNP practice change project structure allowed me to adapt my intervention quickly based on feedback, without being restricted by rigid semester schedules.
That moment reinforced my belief that doctoral-level nursing isn’t about research for the sake of research—it’s about applying evidence in real time to make a tangible difference in patient care.
