Case Study Sarah and James Case Study: Different attitudes towards abortion and social forces.
Case Study
Sarah and James Case Study: Different attitudes towards abortion and social forces.
In the case of Sarah and James, it is seen that their divergent opinions on abortion highlight the inner and outer conflict that a person usually goes through when faced with an unwanted pregnancy (Yong et al., 2023). Sarah is a 24-year-old graduate student who got pregnant unintentionally while using contraception.
She was convinced after a lot of thought that abortion was the best option since she was not yet prepared to be a mother because she was still working and at school. He had been her boyfriend for quite a while and was very against abortion. He was conservative from the beginning and never considered it right to have an abortion; therefore, he found himself in a dilemma of supporting Sarah or not. This developed high emotional conflict in the relationship because Sarah felt that James was not with her and James, in turn, was burdened by guilt and the pressure of religious values on not allowing abortion. The social stigma surrounding abortion only made matters worse; she wanted to rise to the given standards that women have always yearned to be mothers, while James feared that his family and friends would shun him if he did not abhor abortion enough.
All this talking and guidance eventually led Sarah to agree to the procedure, but this time she was emotionally drained and did not know what kind of reaction to have to their relationship in the future. This is a very common case illustrating how differences in personal beliefs and social influence can complicate complicated decisions. Pressure from conformity to social norms coupled with emotional and moral conflict often challenges the environment for couples in reproductive choices. These complex emotional and societal dynamics may be solved between partners and healthcare providers.
Ethical Standards
Ethical values become very necessary in dilemmas similar to that Sarah and James passed in their decision-making process, which had to do with abortion (Levy et al., 2021). In such circumstances, it becomes a case of respecting individual autonomy whereby one’s informed consent follows through into making individual choices on reproduction the right thing for people like Sarah. For example, to Sara, ethical reasoning about exercising autonomy is the freedom that gives her or him reasons to make choices over the body and not other choices. Th,e n on the other hand, there’s James’s ethical belief but in contrast, he’d base his choice according to his values that revolve around personal and cultural ethics. Another aspect of ethical practices in health care relates to both partners’ availability to truthful unbiased information and support provided them to make decisions without any form of coercion or judgment. The struggle between personal values, social forces, and health care rights makes it clear how the complexity of involvement in reproductive decision-making calls for serious consideration of ethical direction when moving such sensitive issues. Assuring respect for the dignity, rights, and well-being of those concerned by health care professionals and individuals is achieved through adherence to ethics standards.
PSYC FPX 2800 Assessment 3 Conclusion
In conclusion, Sarah and James’ case depicts personal beliefs coupled with societal forces that intertwine with standards of right and wrong concerning the way one makes a reproductive choice (Dillarstone et al., 2023). What makes it significant is that despite being a pregnant woman who had used contraception, she nonetheless chose to have it ended. This now raises the emotional and moral dilemma that James may face while going through such relationships, the outcome depending on his morality as well as the cultural values he perceives. The stigma about carrying an abortion also adds a huge load to this situation because even more stress and feelings of guilt fall upon their relationships. This case illustrates a call for supportive, non-judgmental healthcare that has ethics, such as obtaining informed consent and showing regard for patient privacy. In other words, it means clear and easy communication and knowledge among partners in making this critical decision; it further reiterates the environmental issue of society where such individualistic choices are embraced free from judgment or pressure.
PSYC FPX 2800 Assessment 3 References
Dillarstone, H., Brown, L. J., & Flores, E. C. (2023). Climate change, mental health, and reproductive decision-making: A systematic review. PLOS Climate, 2(11), e0000236–e0000236. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000236
Imoize, A. L., Adedeji, O., Tandiya, N., & Shetty, S. (2021). 6G Enabled smart infrastructure for a sustainable society: opportunities, challenges, and research roadmap. Sensors, 21(5), 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051709
Levy, K., Chasalow, K. E., & Riley, S. (2021). Algorithms and decision-making in the public sector. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17(1), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-041221-023808
Meghana Munnangi, Priya Shreedhar, Hedda Lippus, Gilyan, R., Evans, D. P., & Maxwell, L. (2023). “One’s life becomes even more miserable when we hear all those hurtful words.” A mixed methods systematic review of disrespect and abuse in abortion care. Research Square (Research Square). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3710395/v1
