BIO FPX 1000 Assessment 5 Positive and Negative Ramifications of Genetic Testing
Positive and Negative Ramifications of Genetic Testing
Genetic testing may also be of help to the patient in their understanding of any possible risk for hereditary conditions (Musunuru et al., 2020). The process will make it easy to provide earlier detection, thus informing choices in terms of health and reproduction. However, psychological distress due to discrimination potential and a lack of knowledge concerning the results of the tests is probable, which forms a necessary reflection point in the whole process, such that this process must have pros and cons that a patient and a family may go through when deciding to follow the procedure.
Positive Ramifications:
Such genetic testing provides significant information used to analyze the risk of genetic disease in an individual such that early detection and timely management of health issues will be possible (Strianese et al., 2020). For example, individuals who test positive for certain genetic markers predisposing them to cancer can begin with intensified surveillance or interventions that may reduce morbidity and mortality. For example, genetic testing can help family planning since it equips couples with the possibility of assessing the risks involved in passing genetic conditions to their children. This thus empowers individuals and families to make informed decisions concerning their health care, lifestyle, and reproductive choices, leading to better health outcomes.
Negative Ramifications:
While genetic testing offers several advantages, it has several disadvantages (Sekhoacha et al., 2022). The most significant drawback is the psychological impact of getting unexpected or disturbing results, such as a diagnosis that indicates a predisposition to a serious disease. Such knowledge leads to increased anxiety, fear, and uncertainty about the future, thereby adversely affecting mental health and quality of life. Besides these, privacy-related risks and discrimination-related risks exist; that is to say, based on their genetic information, people might find themselves being discriminated against in employment or insurance and will be stigmatized. The interpretation of the results of a test may pose a problem, especially regarding variants of uncertain significance which can be confusing and bring anxiety for patients and even their families.
Impact of Positive and Negative Ramifications
The positive impact of genetic testing can be highly significant since it allows people and their families to make informed decisions about health care and to take proactive measures in preventing and managing disease (Nevin et al., 2021). It means that, having known the genetic predispositions, one can engage in regular screenings, lifestyle changes, and targeted interventions to lower his or her chances of getting a certain disease. For instance, family histories of breast cancer-affected individuals whose test result reveals mutations in BRCA may choose to have recurrent mammography preventive surgeries or chemoprevention. Such a proactive approach improves the quality of life at the individual level and facilitates discussion among families about the risks to health and the benefits of genetic counseling and testing.
While the advantages of genetic testing can be numerous, there are also negative effects that may cause considerable emotional and social problems. False test results might result in anxiety, depression, and a sense of helplessness, especially if people are not well prepared for the consequent effects of their respective genetic predispositions. Additionally, apprehension about discrimination on grounds of genetic information might prevent anyone from seeking even minimal required health care and related assistance services. This results in the fact that patients themselves are reluctant to ask for testing or reveal test findings. Moreover, explaining genetics can be very tricky thus leading to more confusion and doubts and increasing anxiety. Eventually, these will come to be part of not only the person under study but also family life itself as the immediate members relate to the implications that go with shared genetic susceptibility. These have to be measured against each other, thus all the importance placed on relevant genetic counseling and assistance right through the testing process.
BIO FPX 1000 Assessment 5 Conclusion
In simple words, genetic testing is an important tool that comes with immense benefits but also potentially poses some challenges for individuals and families along their health journey (Alvarado‐Wing et al., 2021). The positive factors are the effective prevention of disease, better-informed decision-making, and better planning for a family that in turn leads to improved outcomes about health and empowerment. However, the unwanted side effects, like emotional distress, invasion of privacy, and difficulties in interpreting results, make it greatly important to have proper counseling and support in genetics. The decision to pursue genetic testing should therefore be made after careful consideration of the advantages and disadvantages, allowing an individual to be equipped with access to sufficient resources and information needed to make a decision of importance fitting to their values and circumstances in life.
References
Alvarado‐Wing, T. E., Marshall, J., Best, A., Gomez, J., & Cragun, D. (2021). Exploring racial and ethnic minority individuals’ journey to becoming genetic counselors: Mapping paths to diversifying the genetic counseling profession. Journal of Genetic Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1419
Cohen-Kfir, N., Bentwich, M. E., Kent, A., Dickman, N., Tanus, M., Higazi, B., Kalfon, L., Rudolf, M., & Falik-Zaccai, T. C. (2020). Challenges to effective and autonomous genetic testing and counseling for ethno-cultural minorities: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00537-8
Friesner, J., Colón‐Carmona, A., Schnoes, A. M., Stepanova, A., Mason, G. A., Macintosh, G. C., Ullah, H., Baxter, I., Callis, J., Sierra‐Cajas, K., Elliott, K., Haswell, E. S., Zavala, M. E., Wildermuth, M., Williams, M., Ayalew, M., Henkhaus, N., Prunet, N., Lemaux, P. G., & Yadegari, R. (2021). Broadening the impact of plant science through innovative, integrative, and inclusive outreach. Plant Direct, 5(4), e00316. https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.316
Malgorzata, M., Maria, S., & Michał, W. (2021). Genetic testing—whether to allow complete freedom? Direct-to-consumer tests versus genetic tests for medical purposes. Journal of Applied Genetics, 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-021-00670-z
Mattaini, K. (2020, July 27). Chapter 18. Mendelian genetics. Rwu.pressbooks.pub. https://rwu.pressbooks.pub/bio103/chapter/mendelian-genetics/
Musunuru, K., Hershberger, R. E., Day, S. M., Klinedinst, N. J., Landstrom, A. P., Parikh, V. N., Prakash, S., Semsarian, C., & Sturm, A. C. (2020). Genetic testing for inherited cardiovascular diseases: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1161/hcg.0000000000000067
